2003 MG ZT-T vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 2003 MG ZT-T is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Renault Racoon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT-T weights approximately 620 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MG ZT-T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT-T (250 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2003 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZT-T | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
Make | MG | Renault |
Model | ZT-T | Racoon |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 107 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1005 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2770 mm |