2003 MG ZT-T vs. 2000 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2003 MG ZT-T is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Peugeot 607. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Peugeot 607 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 607 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot 607 (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT-T. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT-T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT-T weights approximately 745 kg more than 2000 Peugeot 607.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot 607 (386 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZT-T. (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZT-T.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZT-T | 2000 Peugeot 607 | |
Make | MG | Peugeot |
Model | ZT-T | 607 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 386 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |