2003 MG ZT vs. 1958 Talbot 2500

To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Talbot 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Talbot 2500 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Talbot 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1958 Talbot 2500. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1958 Talbot 2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 485 kg more than 1958 Talbot 2500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1958 Talbot 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Talbot 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Talbot 2500. (196 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Talbot 2500.

Compare all specifications: