2003 MG ZT vs. 1965 Saab MC
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Saab MC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Saab MC would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1965 Saab MC. (54 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1965 Saab MC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 597 kg more than 1965 Saab MC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Saab MC. (91 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Saab MC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MG ZT | 1965 Saab MC | |
| Make | MG | Saab |
| Model | ZT | MC |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 841 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 54 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 91 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2500 mm |
