2003 MG ZT vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 675 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZT | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | MG | Mitsubishi |
Model | ZT | Colt |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2310 mm |