2003 MG ZT vs. 1992 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 675 kg more than 1992 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MG ZT | 1992 Renault Clio | |
| Make | MG | Renault |
| Model | ZT | Clio |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
