2003 MG ZT vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan CQ-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 633 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan CQ-X has automatic transmission and 2003 MG ZT has manual transmission. 2003 MG ZT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan CQ-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MG ZT | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
| Make | MG | Nissan |
| Model | ZT | CQ-X |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 852 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |
