2003 MG ZT vs. 1998 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1998 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1998 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 750 kg more than 1998 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZT | 1998 Mini MK VII | |
Make | MG | Mini |
Model | ZT | MK VII |
Year Released | 2003 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6130 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2040 mm |