2003 MG ZT vs. 2001 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Seat Arosa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Seat Arosa would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2001 Seat Arosa. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2001 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 196 kg more than 2001 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Seat Arosa (236 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZT. (215 Nm). This means 2001 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZT | 2001 Seat Arosa | |
Make | MG | Seat |
Model | ZT | Arosa |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 236 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1289 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2340 mm |