2003 MG ZT vs. 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZT would be higher. At 2,460 cc, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 167 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZT. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MG ZT | 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle | |
| Make | MG | Volkswagen |
| Model | ZT | Caravelle |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2460 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 129 HP |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1318 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3010 mm |
