2003 MG ZT vs. 2010 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2010 Renault Symbol is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZT would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2010 Renault Symbol. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 485 kg more than 2010 Renault Symbol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Symbol. (105 Nm). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MG ZT | 2010 Renault Symbol | |
Make | MG | Renault |
Model | ZT | Symbol |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 215 Nm | 105 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2473 mm |