2003 Mini One vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2003 Mini One is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mini One is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mini One (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mini One should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mini One weights approximately 130 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mini One (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Mini One will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mini One | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Mini | Riley |
Model | One | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 25 L |