2003 Mini One vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2003 Mini One is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (95 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Mini One. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mini One.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mini One, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mini One (180 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Mini One will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mini One | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Mini | Volvo |
| Model | One | 140 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1364 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 95 HP |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 84.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2620 mm |
