2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse (146 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse (214 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
Model | Eclipse | Colorado |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2350 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 214 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |