2003 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz R weights approximately 1455 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mitsubishi eK | 2010 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | eK | R |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5156 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1661 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3216 mm |
