2003 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mitsubishi eK | 2011 Audi TT | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
| Model | eK | TT |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2469 mm |
