2003 Mitsubishi eK vs. 2011 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford S-Max is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi eK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi eK would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford S-Max weights approximately 953 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi eK.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 2011 Ford S-Max has manual transmission. 2011 Ford S-Max will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mitsubishi eK | 2011 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | eK | S-Max |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1743 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2860 mm |