2003 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 1962 Zastava 750
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 766 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Zastava 750 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 105 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | 1962 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Zastava |
| Model | Minica | 750 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 766 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 605 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2010 mm |
