2003 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2003 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mitsubishi Minica | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
Model | Minica | Epica |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |