2003 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 2003 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mitsubishi Minica | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Minica | Matrix |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2601 mm |