2003 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,350 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander (138 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 504 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander (214 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Outlander | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2350 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2390 mm |