2003 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 134 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 525 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (271 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander. (176 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | Outlander | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2750 mm |