2003 Nissan 350Z vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 2003 Nissan 350Z is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan 350Z (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 14 kg more than 1986 Rover 825. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Rover 825, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan 350Z (363 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Rover 825. (268 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Rover 825.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Nissan 350Z | 1986 Rover 825 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | 350Z | 825 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3490 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 363 Nm | 268 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 22.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 68 L |