2003 Nissan Almera vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2003 Nissan Almera is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan Almera (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 115 kg more than 2003 Nissan Almera.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan Almera (175 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Nissan Almera | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Nissan | Triumph |
| Model | Almera | Renown |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1461 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
