2003 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 324 kg more than 2003 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2003 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Nissan Bluebird | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Bluebird | CR-V |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |