2003 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 47 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Because 2003 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Honda Jazz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Honda Jazz has automatic transmission and 2003 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Honda Jazz will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Bluebird | Jazz |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1500 cc | 1339 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
