2003 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 475 kg more than 2003 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2003 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Nissan Bluebird | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Bluebird | Mustang |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 438 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1176 kg | 1651 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1412 mm |