2003 Nissan Cima vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Cima weights approximately 340 kg more than 2010 Renault Megane.
Because 2003 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Nissan Cima | 2010 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Cima | Megane |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4500 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |
