2003 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan Pathfinder (360 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Nissan Pathfinder | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Nissan | Smart |
Model | Pathfinder | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 72.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 81.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 33 L |