2003 Noble M14 vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2003 Noble M14 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Noble M14 (396 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Noble M14 should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 480 kg more than 2003 Noble M14.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Noble M14 | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Noble | Volvo |
Model | M14 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2850 mm |