2003 Oldsmobile Alero vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Oldsmobile Alero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Oldsmobile Alero would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero (139 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Oldsmobile Alero (203 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2003 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Oldsmobile Alero | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
Model | Alero | Aveo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 46 L |