2003 Opel Astra vs. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2003 Opel Astra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 802 kg more than 2003 Opel Astra.
Because 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Opel Astra | 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Opel | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Astra | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 81 L |
