2003 Opel Combo vs. 1952 Renault Juva
To start off, 2003 Opel Combo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,686 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Combo weights approximately 384 kg more than 1952 Renault Juva.
Because 1952 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Opel Combo | 1952 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Opel | Renault |
| Model | Combo | Juva |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1686 cc | 1003 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 816 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2360 mm |
