2003 Opel Combo vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Combo would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2003 Opel Combo. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Combo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 635 kg more than 2003 Opel Combo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Combo. (126 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Opel Combo | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Opel | Toyota |
Model | Combo | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1686 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 87 L |