2003 Opel Combo vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Combo would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Combo weights approximately 635 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Opel Combo (138 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Opel Combo | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Opel | Tata |
Model | Combo | Nano |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 37 L |