2003 Opel Meriva vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Meriva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Meriva would be higher. At 1,686 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Opel Meriva (99 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Opel Meriva (230 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2003 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Opel Meriva | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Opel | Nissan |
Model | Meriva | Micra |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1686 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 46 L |