2003 Opel Omega vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2003 Opel Omega. (143 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 567 kg more than 2003 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Opel Omega | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Opel | Toyota |
Model | Omega | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 427 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1733 kg | 2300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 99 L |