2003 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 508 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 508 (168 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2003 Opel Omega. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Omega.
Because 2003 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Opel Omega | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
Make | Opel | Peugeot |
Model | Omega | 508 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4792 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1853 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2817 mm |