2003 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2003 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Omega weights approximately 48 kg more than 2012 Subaru Outback.

Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Outback (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Omega. (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Opel Omega 2012 Subaru Outback
Make Opel Subaru
Model Omega Outback
Year Released 2003 2012
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 2198 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 142 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 209 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1665 kg 1617 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 70 L