2003 Opel Vectra vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Vectra would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Opel Vectra. (153 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Vectra.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Opel Vectra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Vectra. (229 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Vectra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Opel Vectra | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Opel | Mazda |
| Model | Vectra | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2172 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 229 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
