2003 Pagani Zonda vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Pagani Zonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Pagani Zonda would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 389 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Because 2003 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Pagani Zonda | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Pagani | Holden |
| Model | Zonda | Epica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 542 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4395 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2055 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1151 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
