2003 Peugeot 206 vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 2003 Peugeot 206 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Peugeot 206. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2003 Peugeot 206.
Because 1979 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 164 (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Peugeot 206. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Peugeot 206.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Peugeot 206 | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 206 | 164 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3350 mm |