2003 Peugeot 407 vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Peugeot 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Peugeot 407 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Peugeot 407. (155 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Peugeot 407. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Peugeot 407 weights approximately 87 kg more than 2012 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Peugeot 407. (217 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Peugeot 407.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Peugeot 407 | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
Model | 407 | 6 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2230 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1571 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |