2003 Pininfarina Enjoy vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy. (133 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 390 kg more than 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Pininfarina | Sunbeam |
| Model | Enjoy | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1080 mm | 1310 mm |
