2003 Pontiac GTO vs. 1969 Renault 12
To start off, 2003 Pontiac GTO is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 12 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pontiac GTO (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1969 Renault 12. (113 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 12. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 760 kg more than 1969 Renault 12. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Pontiac GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Pontiac GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Renault 12, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pontiac GTO (495 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Renault 12. (140 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Pontiac GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Pontiac GTO | 1969 Renault 12 | |
| Make | Pontiac | Renault |
| Model | GTO | 12 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 89 L |
