2003 Pontiac GTO vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2003 Pontiac GTO is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pontiac GTO (350 HP) has 297 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 710 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pontiac GTO (495 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Pontiac GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Pontiac GTO | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Pontiac | Zastava |
Model | GTO | 1300 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2430 mm |