2003 Proton 300 vs. 1968 Toyota Crown

To start off, 2003 Proton 300 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1968 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Toyota Crown (98 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Toyota Crown weights approximately 340 kg more than 2003 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Toyota Crown (201 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 300.

Compare all specifications: