2003 Proton 300 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Kalos
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Kalos is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton 300 (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Kalos. (71 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Kalos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Proton 300 (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Kalos. (104 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Proton 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Kalos.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Proton 300 | 2012 Chevrolet Kalos | |
Make | Proton | Chevrolet |
Model | 300 | Kalos |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1150 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2490 mm |