2003 Proton 400 vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 565 kg more than 2003 Proton 400.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Proton 400 | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Proton | Chevrolet |
Model | 400 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2750 mm |