2003 Proton 400 vs. 2009 Renault Logan
To start off, 2009 Renault Logan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,459 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Logan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Renault Logan. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Logan weights approximately 95 kg more than 2003 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Logan (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Logan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Proton 400 | 2009 Renault Logan | |
Make | Proton | Renault |
Model | 400 | Logan |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2640 mm |